VIA Youth Survey

General Information on the Measure
Purpose of the measure

The VIA Youth Survey was designed to measure strengths of character that contribute positively growth and development.

Main constructs measured

Intrapersonal competencies; Interpersonal competencies

Applicable grade levels

Children ages 10-17

Publication year for the most recent version

No information available in the references reviewed.

Year originally developed

2004

Related measures
Measure Administration
Respondent

Student

Method of administration

Digital

Number of items

96

Item format

Five-point Likert-type scale

Administration time

15 minutes

Available languages

The assessment is available in more than 20 languages, including English, French, and Spanish.

Fee for use Free and publicly available
Credentials required for administration

None

Scoring
Overall score reporting

Numeric scores are not reported. Twenty-four specific character strengths are provided in rank order, based on responses.

Strengths include:

  • Appreciation of beauty & excellence
  • Love
  • Curiosity
  • Gratitude
  • Humor
  • Creativity
  • Perseverance
  • Leadership
  • Love of learning
  • Zest
  • Teamwork
  • Hope
  • Kindness
  • Perspective
  • Social Intelligence
  • Fairness
  • Prudence
  • Forgiveness
  • Honesty
  • Self-Regulation
  • Bravery
  • Humility
  • Judgment
  • Spirituality

Additional score information is available for purchase in the VIA Youth Decoder Report, as well are recommendations on interpretation and use.

Subscore reporting

No subscores are reported (in the free version).

Scoring procedures

Scoring is done by computer, and results are available immediately upon completion. Though not reported, subscale scores are formed by averaging the relevant items.

Interpretive information

No interpretive information is available in the free version.

Evidence of Technical Quality
Populations for which technical quality evidence has been collected

Evidence has been collected from several samples. Park and Peterson (2006) used two samples: The first sample was of 1,300 middle and high school students in seven states, with a paper and pencil form, and 736 online users (ages 10-17). The VIA institute has published additional technical studies collected from subsequent samples of youth surveys.

Reliability evidence

Studies of the 96-item short form have found that internal consistency was fair to strong for all 24 character strength subscales (average Cronbach's alpha = 0.87), min=0.69, max=0.95). Based on the original 198 item form, test-retest reliability within a six-month period was fair to strong for the subscales (mean test-retest correlation = 0.58, min=0.46, max=0.71) (Park & Peterson, 2006).

Validity evidence
Evidence based on content
No information available in the references reviewed.
Evidence based on response processes
No information available in the references reviewed.
Evidence based on internal structure
This evidence was obtained through Exploratory Factor Analysis was conducted on the 24 character strengths (not at the item level), and found support for four main types of character strength (Park and Peterson, 2006).
Evidence based on relations with other variables
The 24 character strengths were also rated by teachers, and correlations were positive (though not always statistically significant) (Park and Peterson, 2006). Other measures of social skills (using the Social Skills Rating System (Gresham & Elliott, 1990) and life satisfaction (using the Student’s Life Satisfaction Scale (Huebner, 1991) also showed positive (though not always significant) relationships. The mean correlation of the character strengths with life satisfaction was reported at 0.39.
Locating the Measure
Obtaining a copy of the measure viacharacter.org
References

Park, N., & Peterson, C. "Moral competence and character strengths among adolescents: The development and validation of the Values in Action Inventory of Strengths for Youth," Journal of adolescence, 29 (6), 2006, pp. 891–909.

Notes

This measure is also reviewed in the AWG Guide.

Measure summary updated October 29, 2018.